IMbrave 151: Atezolizumab With or Without Bevacizumab in Combination With GemCis in Advanced BTC

IMbrave 151 examined the efficacy of the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab with or without the VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab, and gemcitabine/cisplatin as first-line treatments in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

The first-line standard of care for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is chemotherapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) combined with the immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab; however, efforts are being made to further improve outcomes in these patients. By fostering an immune-permissive tumor microenvironment, it has been proposed that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) blockade combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy can improve responses to PD-L1 inhibition.

This trial examined the efficacy of the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab (atezo), the VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab (bev), and GemCis as first-line treatments for patients with advanced BTC.

Anthony El-Khoueiry, MD, presented findings from IMbrave 151 at the 2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. This trial examined the efficacy of the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab (atezo), the VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab (bev), and GemCis as first-line treatments for patients with advanced BTC. Enrolled patients had histologically confirmed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), extrahepatic CCA, or gallbladder cancer and no prior systemic treatment. The results were stratified by location of primary tumor, presence of metastatic disease, and geographic region. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to GemCis plus bev (15 mg/kg intravenously [IV] every 3 weeks) and atezo (1200 mg IV every 3 weeks), or GemCis plus placebo and atezo (1200 mg IV every 3 weeks) for 8 cycles followed by continued maintenance with atezo and bev or atezo and placebo until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or loss of benefit. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), safety, and patient-reported outcomes/quality of life.

A total of 162 patients with previously untreated advanced BTC were randomly assigned: 79 patients received atezo and bev plus GemCis, and 83 patients received atezo and placebo plus GemCis. The median age was 63 years, and 54% of patients had iCCA, 82% of patients had metastatic disease, and 56% were PD-L1 negative.

The median PFS was 8.3 months with the addition of bev versus 7.9 months without bev (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.14), and 6-month PFS rates were 78% and 63%, respectively. In a subgroup analysis of PFS, atezo and bev plus GemCis was favored in a majority of subgroups, but a notable benefit was seen in women, patients treated outside of Asia, patients with locally advanced disease, and those without prior BTC surgery.

The ORR for patients treated with atezo and bev plus GemCis was 24% versus 25% in patients treated with atezo and placebo plus GemCis. The DCR was 78.5% versus 75.9% in the bev arm versus the placebo arm, and the median DOR was not reached in the bev group and 5.8 months with placebo. The median OS has not been reached in the GemCis plus atezo and bev arm, and it was 11.4 months in the GemCis plus atezo and placebo arm.

In a subgroup analysis of PFS in patients with a complete or partial response, the median PFS was not reached in the bev arm, and it was 8.3 months in the placebo arm (HR, 0.51). In patients with stable disease, the median PFS was 8.3 months in the bev arm and 8.4 months in the placebo arm (HR, 1.00).

Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 57% of patients in the bev arm and 60% in the placebo arm. The most common grade 3/4 (≥20%) TRAEs in both groups were anemia, decreased neutrophil count, and neutropenia. All-grade AEs occurred more frequently during the chemotherapy phase than in the maintenance phase.

Although follow-up for OS is still underway, the results imply that atezo and bev with GemCis may have a therapeutic advantage in a subset of patients and has a tolerable safety profile with minimum additional toxicity.

Source:

El-Khoueiry A, Ren Z, Chon HJ, et al. A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of bevacizu-

mab in combination with atezolizumab and gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: IMbrave 151. Oral abstract presented at: ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, January 19-21; San Francisco, CA. Abstract 491.

Related Items

First-Line Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers (BTCs)
Ask the Expert
Use of first-line (1L) IMFINZI® (durvalumab) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem-cis) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers
KEYNOTE-966: Pembrolizumab Combined With GemCis Versus GemCis Alone in Patients With BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the KEYNOTE-966 study, pembrolizumab was added to gemcitabine/cisplatin to assess outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
Post-hoc Analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 Trials in Patients With Advanced eCCA
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
This post-hoc analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 clinical trials provides reference survival data for patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy.
Efficacy and Safety of Tinengotinib in Patients With Advanced Refractory/Relapsed CCA Who Previously Received an FGFR Inhibitor
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Investigators pooled data from 3 trials to evaluate tinengotinib in patients with advanced, refractory/relapsed cholangiocarcinoma who previously received an FGFR inhibitor.
KLF5 Inhibition Reduces Tumor Growth and Sensitizes to Chemotherapy-Induced Cell Death in Experimental Models of CCA
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Researchers evaluated KLF5 expression and its inhibition in cholangiocarcinoma using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats technology.
Phase 2 Trial of SHR-1316 Plus IBI310 in Patients With Advanced iCCA After Inadequate Response to First-Line Therapy
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In this ongoing phase 2 study, the efficacy of SHR-1316 plus IBI310 is being evaluated in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after inadequate response to first-line therapy.
Examination of Patients With CCA Treated With Novel Targeted Therapies After Extended Molecular Profiling on Liquid Biopsies
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Dr Mahmood presented results from the largest multi-institutional review of efficacy outcomes following targeted agents in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.
Phase 2 Component of the BEER-BTC Study: Comparing Bevacizumab Plus Erlotinib Maintenance Versus Observation in Patients With Advanced BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the phase 2 component of the phase 2/3 BEER-BTC study, bevacizumab plus erlotinib improved outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers.
The DEBATE Trial: Neoadjuvant Durvalumab Plus GemCis Versus GemCis Alone for Patients With Localized BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Researchers investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) versus GemCis alone in patients with biliary tract cancer.
The Phase 2 ADJUBIL Study of Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab With or Without Capecitabine in BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the ongoing phase 2 ADJUBIL study, the clinical activity of immunotherapies durvalumab and tremelimumab with or without capecitabine is being assessed in patients with resectable biliary tract cancer in the adjuvant setting.

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our newsletter or print publications, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive: