GemCis and Nab-Paclitaxel Versus GemCis in Advanced BTC: Results From the SWOG 1815 Study

Results of the SWOG 1815 study failed to demonstrate a benefit with the addition of nab-paclitaxel to gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) versus GemCis alone.

The standard of care for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has traditionally included gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis)-based regimens; however, the median overall survival (OS) is only about 12 months, emphasizing the need for a regimen that improves patient outcomes. Albumin-bound paclitaxel combined with GemCis (GAP) showed promising efficacy, with a median OS of 19.2 months in a single-arm phase 2 study. Results from SWOG 1815, a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing GAP with GemCis in patients with advanced BTC, were presented by Rachna Shroff, MD, MS, at the 2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically proven, untreated advanced BTC were randomly assigned 2:1 to GAP or GemCis. Patients were restaged every 3 cycles until disease progression. The primary end point was OS, with a target hazard ratio of 0.7 with 90% power and a 1-sided alpha of 0.025. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and CA 19-9 changes. Randomization was stratified by intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) versus gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBC) versus extrahepatic CCA (eCCA), locally advanced versus metastatic, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 versus 1.

A total of 441 eligible patients were randomly assigned, 294 to GAP and 147 to GemCis. In all, 67% of patients had iCCA, 16% had GBC, and 17% had eCCA. A total of 73% of patients had metastases versus locally advanced disease. The addition of nab-paclitaxel to GemCis did not confer a survival benefit: the median OS was 14 months with GAP versus 12.7 months with GemCis (P=.65). The median PFS for GAP versus GemCis was 8.2 months versus 6.4 months (P=.43). No significant differences were seen between GAP and GemCis by disease site, but a trend was evident toward better survival with GAP in patients with GBC, with a median OS of 17 months with GAP versus 9.3 months with GemCis.

Results from SWOG 1815, a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing GAP with GemCis in patients with advanced BTC, were presented by Rachna Shroff, MD, MS, at the 2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium.

In an exploratory subset analysis of patients with locally advanced disease, the median OS was 19.2 months with GAP versus 13.7 months with GemCis (P=.01). A similar trend in PFS was seen in patients with locally advanced disease, with a median PFS of 9.3 months with GAP versus 7.6 months with GemCis (P=.04). The ORR was 31% with GAP versus 22% with GemCis, and the DCR was 77% with GAP versus 69% with GemCis. The ORR in patients with GBC was 44% with GAP versus 22% with GemCis; in addition, a slight improvement was seen in patients with eCCA, with an ORR of 34% versus 21% with GAP versus GemCis, respectively, but this improvement was not significant. The ORR in patients with locally advanced disease was 28% with GAP versus 21% with GemCis, and 32% versus 23% in patients with metastatic disease, but this too was not significant. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with GAP included anemia (33%), neutropenia (37%), leukopenia (25%), and thrombocytopenia (20%). The most common grade 3-4 TRAEs with GemCis were anemia (22%), neutropenia (28%), thrombocytopenia (15%), and leukopenia (10%). Other TRAEs included alopecia, alanine transaminase increase, anorexia, constipation, edema, hypomagnesemia, nausea, and vomiting.

SWOG 1815 did not produce a significant increase in median OS, and greater rates of TRAEs were seen with GAP, but there was no difference in discontinuation rates between the 2 groups. Although previous studies had promising outcomes, the results of SWOG 1815 failed to show a benefit with the addition of nab-paclitaxel to GemCis. Patients with locally advanced disease and GBC may benefit from GAP, but further research is needed to fully understand its therapeutic usefulness in these patient subgroups.

Source:

Shroff RT, Guthrie KA, Scott AJ, et al. SWOG 1815: a phase III randomized trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine and cisplatin in newly diagnosed, advanced biliary tract cancers. Oral abstract presented at: ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, January 19-21, 2023; San Francisco, CA. Abstract LBA490.

Related Items

First-Line Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers (BTCs)
Ask the Expert
Use of first-line (1L) IMFINZI® (durvalumab) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem-cis) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers
KEYNOTE-966: Pembrolizumab Combined With GemCis Versus GemCis Alone in Patients With BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the KEYNOTE-966 study, pembrolizumab was added to gemcitabine/cisplatin to assess outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
Post-hoc Analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 Trials in Patients With Advanced eCCA
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
This post-hoc analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 clinical trials provides reference survival data for patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy.
Efficacy and Safety of Tinengotinib in Patients With Advanced Refractory/Relapsed CCA Who Previously Received an FGFR Inhibitor
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Investigators pooled data from 3 trials to evaluate tinengotinib in patients with advanced, refractory/relapsed cholangiocarcinoma who previously received an FGFR inhibitor.
KLF5 Inhibition Reduces Tumor Growth and Sensitizes to Chemotherapy-Induced Cell Death in Experimental Models of CCA
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Researchers evaluated KLF5 expression and its inhibition in cholangiocarcinoma using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats technology.
Phase 2 Trial of SHR-1316 Plus IBI310 in Patients With Advanced iCCA After Inadequate Response to First-Line Therapy
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In this ongoing phase 2 study, the efficacy of SHR-1316 plus IBI310 is being evaluated in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after inadequate response to first-line therapy.
Examination of Patients With CCA Treated With Novel Targeted Therapies After Extended Molecular Profiling on Liquid Biopsies
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Dr Mahmood presented results from the largest multi-institutional review of efficacy outcomes following targeted agents in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.
Phase 2 Component of the BEER-BTC Study: Comparing Bevacizumab Plus Erlotinib Maintenance Versus Observation in Patients With Advanced BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the phase 2 component of the phase 2/3 BEER-BTC study, bevacizumab plus erlotinib improved outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers.
The DEBATE Trial: Neoadjuvant Durvalumab Plus GemCis Versus GemCis Alone for Patients With Localized BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Researchers investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) versus GemCis alone in patients with biliary tract cancer.
The Phase 2 ADJUBIL Study of Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab With or Without Capecitabine in BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the ongoing phase 2 ADJUBIL study, the clinical activity of immunotherapies durvalumab and tremelimumab with or without capecitabine is being assessed in patients with resectable biliary tract cancer in the adjuvant setting.

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our newsletter or print publications, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive: