Final Results of ClarIDHy Trial of Ivosidenib in Patients with Previously Treated CCA Harboring an IDH1 Mutation

2021 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma — December 17, 2021

Final results of the ClarIDHy trial demonstrated the clinical benefit of ivosidenib in patients with previously treated unresectable or metastatic CCA harboring an IDH1 mutation.

The global, phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind ClarIDHy study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02989857) compared the first-in-class, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1 ivosidenib with placebo in patients with previously treated unresectable or advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) who harbor IDH1 mutations. Final results of the ClarIDHy study were presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancers Annual Meeting.

In the ClarIDHy study, eligibility criteria included unresectable or metastatic CCA, centrally confirmed IDH1 mutations by next-generation sequencing, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 or 1; measurable disease (RECIST version 1.1), and 1 or 2 prior therapies. Eligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive ivosidenib (500 mg once daily in continuous 28-day cycles) or placebo. Stratification was by number of prior systemic therapies (1 or 2). The study design allowed crossover from placebo to ivosidenib upon radiographic disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent radiology center (IRC). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, investigator-assessed PFS, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Since crossover may confound estimates of survival, rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) was applied to adjust for crossover in the trial. The data cutoff was May 31, 2020.

A total of 187 eligible patients were randomized to receive ivosidenib (n = 126) or placebo (n = 61). The median age of the study population was 62 years. The majority of the participants were female, had intrahepatic CCA (91%), and had metastatic disease (93%). Overall, 47% of the patients had received 2 prior therapies. The majority of patients receiving placebo (70.5%) crossed over to open-label ivosidenib upon radiographic disease progression and unblinding, as permitted by the study protocol. At data cutoff, 25 (15.1%) patients remained on ivosidenib for ≥1 years, including 6 crossover patients.

The primary end point was met with significant improvement in PFS by IRC with ivosidenib versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.54; P <.0001), which extended across all prespecified subgroups tested, including sex, prior lines of therapy, extent of disease at screening, cancer type at initial diagnosis, and ECOG PS. The disease control rate was 53% with ivosidenib versus 28% with placebo.

OS analysis, following 79% OS events in the ivosidenib arm and 82% in the placebo arm, showed a favorable trend for improved OS with ivosidenib treatment versus placebo (median OS, 10.3 vs 7.5 months, respectively; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.56-1.12; one-sided P = .093). After accounting for crossover, the RPSFT-adjusted median OS was 5.1 months with placebo (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.70; P <.0001).

Common all-grade ivosidenib treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that occurred in ≥15% of the patients included nausea (41.5%), diarrhea (35.0%), fatigue (30.9%), cough (25.2%), abdominal pain (24.4%), decreased appetite (24.4%), ascites (22.8%), vomiting (22.8%), and anemia (17.9%). A higher proportion of patients in the ivosidenib cohort, compared with the placebo cohort, experienced grade ≥3 TEAEs (53.0% vs 37.3%, respectively). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs associated with ivosidenib therapy included ascites (9.0%), anemia (7.2%), and increased blood bilirubin (5.4%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred more frequently in the placebo arm than in the ivosidenib arm (8.5% vs 6.6%, respectively).

Compared with those in the placebo group, ivosidenib-treated patients preserved HRQOL physical functioning subscale and pain subscales. Patients in the ivosidenib cohort experienced significantly less decline in physical and emotional functioning domains of quality of life at cycle 2, day 1, compared with those in the placebo group (nominal P <.05).

The final results of the ClarIDHy trial demonstrated the clinical benefit of ivosidenib in patients with previously treated, unresectable or metastatic CCA who harbor an IDH1 mutation in terms of PFS, safety, and HRQOL, demonstrating a favorable OS trend despite a high rate of crossover.

These results were recently published, and on August 25, 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ivosidenib for adult patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic CCA with an IDH1 mutation, as detected by an FDA-approved test.

Sources: Abou-Alfa GK, Macarulla T, Javle MM, et al. Final results from ClarIDHy, a global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of ivosidenib (IVO) versus placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with previously treated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and an isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl_15):4069-4069.

Zhu AX, Macarulla T, Javle MM, et al. Final overall results of ivosidenib for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with IDH1 mutation: the phase 3 randomized clinical ClarIDHy trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7:1669-1677.

Related Items

First-Line Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers (BTCs)
Ask the Expert
Use of first-line (1L) IMFINZI® (durvalumab) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem-cis) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers
KEYNOTE-966: Pembrolizumab Combined With GemCis Versus GemCis Alone in Patients With BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the KEYNOTE-966 study, pembrolizumab was added to gemcitabine/cisplatin to assess outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
Post-hoc Analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 Trials in Patients With Advanced eCCA
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
This post-hoc analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 clinical trials provides reference survival data for patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy.
Efficacy and Safety of Tinengotinib in Patients With Advanced Refractory/Relapsed CCA Who Previously Received an FGFR Inhibitor
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Investigators pooled data from 3 trials to evaluate tinengotinib in patients with advanced, refractory/relapsed cholangiocarcinoma who previously received an FGFR inhibitor.
KLF5 Inhibition Reduces Tumor Growth and Sensitizes to Chemotherapy-Induced Cell Death in Experimental Models of CCA
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Researchers evaluated KLF5 expression and its inhibition in cholangiocarcinoma using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats technology.
Phase 2 Trial of SHR-1316 Plus IBI310 in Patients With Advanced iCCA After Inadequate Response to First-Line Therapy
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In this ongoing phase 2 study, the efficacy of SHR-1316 plus IBI310 is being evaluated in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after inadequate response to first-line therapy.
Examination of Patients With CCA Treated With Novel Targeted Therapies After Extended Molecular Profiling on Liquid Biopsies
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Dr Mahmood presented results from the largest multi-institutional review of efficacy outcomes following targeted agents in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.
Phase 2 Component of the BEER-BTC Study: Comparing Bevacizumab Plus Erlotinib Maintenance Versus Observation in Patients With Advanced BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the phase 2 component of the phase 2/3 BEER-BTC study, bevacizumab plus erlotinib improved outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers.
The DEBATE Trial: Neoadjuvant Durvalumab Plus GemCis Versus GemCis Alone for Patients With Localized BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Researchers investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) versus GemCis alone in patients with biliary tract cancer.
The Phase 2 ADJUBIL Study of Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab With or Without Capecitabine in BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the ongoing phase 2 ADJUBIL study, the clinical activity of immunotherapies durvalumab and tremelimumab with or without capecitabine is being assessed in patients with resectable biliary tract cancer in the adjuvant setting.

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our newsletter or print publications, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive: