Early Molecular Testing for Patients with CCA Crucial to Inform Treatment Choices

2020 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma — December 18, 2020

Genomic data analysis of publicly available data supports the high prevalence of potentially actionable mutations in patients with CCA, supporting use of personalized therapies alone or in combination with chemotherapy.

During the past decade, the number of treatable tumor-specific molecular aberrations has grown substantially. The survival benefit was obtained from matching biomarkers to therapies in several types of cancer, such as breast, colon, and lung. Molecular diagnostic techniques have become integral to provide information regarding tumor diagnosis and prognosis as well as therapeutic decisions in oncology practice.

According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, molecular testing should be considered before primary therapy is initiated. With the advent of next-generation sequencing to oncology practice, we now have a better understanding of genetic landscapes and can better identify potential actionable genomic alterations, including those in patients diagnosed with CCA.

A major stumbling block to the discovery of molecular aberrations in patients with CCA has been the adoption of molecular profiling by healthcare providers. Only a minority of patients with newly diagnosed CCA undergo comprehensive molecular profiling because oncologists have been slow to incorporate these new tests effectively into routine patient care. Educating the oncology providers is integral so patients can benefit from this technology and receive the appropriate testing when they are diagnosed.

Francesca Avogadri-Connors, PhD, QED Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, and colleagues examined genetic abnormalities previously discovered in patients with CCA to uncover the prevalence of actionable genomic mutations that may make patients candidates for intervention with investigational therapies. Results were presented at this year’s annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research. The analysis was conducted using a comprehensive literature review and analysis of multiplatform genomic data from publicly available databases. For this study, actionable genomic alterations were defined as known or likely driver mutations, all gene fusions, or select copy number alterations. Correlative analysis of genomic alterations and clinical trial options was performed using an in-silico cohort of patients with CCA with available clinical genomic data extracted from the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics database, version 3.1.6.

The in-silico cohort consisted of 393 patients with CCA (median age at diagnosis, 59 years; 55% male, 45% female; stage IV CCA, 65%) from the cBioPortal database. IDH1/2 mutations (10%-18%), FGFR2 fusions (10%-20%), and CDKN2A deletion (9%-20%) were the most common genomic alterations for each variant type.

Additional actionable genomic variants, which were mostly mutually exclusive, included KRAS (8%), PIK3CA (5%), PTEN (4%), ERBB2 (2.5%), BRAF (1.8%), and NTRK (1.8%). Three (1.6%) of the 190 patients in the study were classified as microsatellite instability high.

Approximately 45% to 50% of patients with CCA have an actionable mutation and may be candidates for precise, personalized therapies alone or in combination with chemotherapy according to these data. Tumor molecular phenotypes predict responses to targeted therapies. This may provide a rationale for a randomized umbrella clinical trial with multiple targeted treatment arms and a single shared control arm.

When interviewed by CCA News, Dr Avogadri-Connors said, “It is enlightening to realize that about half of patients with cholangiocarcinoma have at least 1 ‘actionable’ genomic alteration in the malignant tissue, and about 75% have a ‘potentially actionable’ alteration which makes them possibly eligible for clinical studies or novel targeted treatment. I believe these data speak for the need of broader and earlier use of biomarker testing in cholangiocarcinoma patients.”

Source: Avogadri-Connors F, et al. Cancer Res. 2020;80(16_suppl). Abstract 2940.

Related Items

First-Line Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers (BTCs)
Ask the Expert
Use of first-line (1L) IMFINZI® (durvalumab) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem-cis) chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers
KEYNOTE-966: Pembrolizumab Combined With GemCis Versus GemCis Alone in Patients With BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the KEYNOTE-966 study, pembrolizumab was added to gemcitabine/cisplatin to assess outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
Post-hoc Analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 Trials in Patients With Advanced eCCA
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
This post-hoc analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 clinical trials provides reference survival data for patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy.
Efficacy and Safety of Tinengotinib in Patients With Advanced Refractory/Relapsed CCA Who Previously Received an FGFR Inhibitor
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Investigators pooled data from 3 trials to evaluate tinengotinib in patients with advanced, refractory/relapsed cholangiocarcinoma who previously received an FGFR inhibitor.
KLF5 Inhibition Reduces Tumor Growth and Sensitizes to Chemotherapy-Induced Cell Death in Experimental Models of CCA
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Researchers evaluated KLF5 expression and its inhibition in cholangiocarcinoma using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats technology.
Phase 2 Trial of SHR-1316 Plus IBI310 in Patients With Advanced iCCA After Inadequate Response to First-Line Therapy
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In this ongoing phase 2 study, the efficacy of SHR-1316 plus IBI310 is being evaluated in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after inadequate response to first-line therapy.
Examination of Patients With CCA Treated With Novel Targeted Therapies After Extended Molecular Profiling on Liquid Biopsies
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Dr Mahmood presented results from the largest multi-institutional review of efficacy outcomes following targeted agents in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.
Phase 2 Component of the BEER-BTC Study: Comparing Bevacizumab Plus Erlotinib Maintenance Versus Observation in Patients With Advanced BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the phase 2 component of the phase 2/3 BEER-BTC study, bevacizumab plus erlotinib improved outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers.
The DEBATE Trial: Neoadjuvant Durvalumab Plus GemCis Versus GemCis Alone for Patients With Localized BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Researchers investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) versus GemCis alone in patients with biliary tract cancer.
The Phase 2 ADJUBIL Study of Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab With or Without Capecitabine in BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the ongoing phase 2 ADJUBIL study, the clinical activity of immunotherapies durvalumab and tremelimumab with or without capecitabine is being assessed in patients with resectable biliary tract cancer in the adjuvant setting.

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our newsletter or print publications, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive: