Results from SWOG 1815: GemCis and Nab-Paclitaxel versus GemCis in Advanced BTC

March 2023, Vol 4, No 1

Dr. Rachna Shroff

Although regimens including gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) have been standard of care for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs), the median overall survival (OS) is roughly 12 months, warranting the need for a regimen that improves patient outcomes. In a single-arm, phase 2 study, albumin-bound paclitaxel added to GemCis (GAP) demonstrated promising efficacy with a median OS of 19.2 months. At the 2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, Dr Rachna Shroff presented results from SWOG 1815, a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing GAP to GemCis in patients with advanced BTC.

Patients had newly diagnosed, histologically proven, untreated advanced BTC and were randomly assigned 2:1 to GAP versus GemCis. Patients were restaged every 3 cycles until disease progression. The primary end point was OS, with a target hazard ratio of 0.7 with 90% power and a 1-sided alpha of 0.025. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and CA 19-9 changes. Randomization was stratified by intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) versus gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBC) versus extrahepatic CCA (eCCA), locally advanced versus metastatic, and ECOG performance status 0 versus 1.

A total of 441 eligible patients were randomly assigned, 294 to GAP and 147 to GemCis. In all, 67% of patients had iCCA, 16% had GBC, and 17% had eCCA. A total of 73% of patients had metastases versus locally advanced disease. The median OS was 14 months with GAP versus 12.7 months with GemCis (P = .65). The median PFS for GAP versus GemCis was 8.2 months versus 6.4 months (P = .43). No statistically significant differences were seen between GAP and GemCis by disease site, but a trend was evident toward better survival with GAP in patients with GBC, with a median OS of 17 months with GAP versus 9.3 months with GemCis.

In an exploratory subset analysis of patients with locally advanced disease, the median OS was 19.2 months with GAP versus 13.7 months with GemCis (P = .01). A similar trend in PFS was seen in patients with locally advanced disease, with a median PFS of 9.3 months with GAP versus 7.6 months with GemCis (P = .04). The ORR was 31% with GAP versus 22% with GemCis, and the DCR was 77% with GAP versus 69% with GemCis. The ORR in patients with GBC was 44% with GAP versus 22% with GemCis; in addition, a slight improvement was seen in patients with eCCA, with an ORR of 34% versus 21% with GAP versus GemCis, but this improvement was not statistically significant. The ORR in patients with locally advanced disease was 28% with GAP versus 21% with GemCis, and 32% versus 23% in patients with metastatic disease, but this too was not statistically significant. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with GAP included anemia (33%), neutropenia (37%), leukopenia (25%), and thrombocytopenia (20%). The most common grade 3-4 TRAEs with GemCis were anemia (22%), neutropenia (28%), thrombocytopenia (15%), and leukopenia (10%). Other TRAEs included alopecia, alanine transaminase increase, anorexia, constipation, edema, hypomagnesemia, nausea, and vomiting.

SWOG 1815 did not result in a statistically significant improvement in median OS with GAP versus GemCis, and higher rates of TRAEs occurred with GAP but no difference in discontinuation rates between the 2 arms. GAP may be beneficial in patients with locally advanced disease and GBC; however, further analysis is warranted to understand the clinical utility in these subsets of patients.

Source: Shroff RT, Guthrie KA, Scott AJ, et al. SWOG 1815: a phase III randomized trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine and cisplatin in newly diagnosed, advanced biliary tract cancers. Oral abstract presented at: ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, January 19-21, 2023; San Francisco, CA.

Related Items

Tasurgratinib for Patients With FGFR2 Gene Fusion–Positive CCA: A Phase 2 Study
March 2024, Vol 5, No 1
Junji Furuse, MD, PhD, presented the results of a phase 2 study of tasurgratinib efficacy on patients with FGFR2 fusion-positive cholangiocarcinoma following gene fusion status confirmation by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Safety and Efficacy of Telotristat Ethyl Plus First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced BTC: A Phase 2, Open-Label Study
March 2024, Vol 5, No 1
Richard Kim, MD, presented the results of a phase 2, open-label study of patients who underwent telotristat ethyl plus first-line chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer.
Efficacy and Safety of Brigimadlin (BI 907828) in Patients With Advanced BTC: Data From 2 Phase 1a/1b Dose-Escalation/Expansion Trials
March 2024, Vol 5, No 1
Teresa Macarulla, MD, PhD, presented the results of 2 phase 1a/1b dose-escalation/expansion trials, studies that measured the efficacy and safety of brigimadlin in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
COMPANION-002: A Phase 2/3 Randomized Study Design of CTX-009 Combination in Second-Line BTC
March 2024, Vol 5, No 1
A recombinant bispecific antibody, CTX-009, is discussed regarding its role in an ongoing phase 2/3 open-label, randomized, controlled study—a study being conducted to measure the efficacy of CTX-009 in previously treated, advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer.
A Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Anlotinib Plus TQB2450 (PD-L1 Blockade) Plus Nab-Paclitaxel and Cisplatin as First-Line Treatment for Advanced BTC
March 2024, Vol 5, No 1
Cholangiocarcinoma experts presented the preliminary results of a phase 2 clinical trial regarding anlotinib plus TQB2450, nab-paclitaxel, and cisplatin—a study conducted for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer.
Preliminary Results of a Real-World Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Surufatinib in BTC
March 2024, Vol 5, No 1
Zongli Zhang, MD, PhD, presented the preliminary results of an ongoing single-arm, multicenter, open-label, real-world study analyzing the efficacy and safety of surufatinib as a second-line treatment option for patients with biliary tract cancer.
Genomic Factors Indicating Sensitivity to IO and Chemotherapy in CCA
March 2024, Vol 5, No 1
Riya Jayesh Patel, MD, presented how the impact of transcriptomic signatures related to chemotherapy and immunotherapy sensitivity in the cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) cohort of The Cancer Genome Atlas could serve as evidence supporting the effectiveness of metabolism-targeted therapies in overcoming CCA therapeutic resistance.
Examining Real-World Testing, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes After Liquid Biopsy in aCCA
March 2024, Vol 5, No 1
Amit Mahipal, MD, presented results from a real-world data study examining the rates of molecular alterations detected using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for patients receiving ivosidenib following circulating tumor ctDNA-detected IDH1 mutations.
A Phase 2 Primary Analysis of Tislelizumab Plus Lenvatinib and GEMOX as Conversion Therapy in Potentially Resectable Locally Advanced BTC (ZSAB-TransGOLP)
March 2024, Vol 5, No 1
Jia Fan, PhD, presented results from a phase 2 trial that investigated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and a programmed cell death protein-1 antibody as conversion therapy for the treatment of potentially resectable and locally advanced biliary tract cancer.
Role of CD27 Agonist in Combination With PD-L1 and MEK Inhibition on Antitumor Effect and CD8+ T Cells: Expanding Immunotherapy Options in CCA
March 2024, Vol 5, No 1
Frances J. Bennett, MD, presented the results of a phase 2 trial that tested the antitumor effect of dual programmed death-ligand 1 plus mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibition in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our newsletter or print publications, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive: