FGFR Inhibition in Cholangiocarcinoma: Overcoming Acquired Resistance

December 2020, Vol 1, No 3

In April 2020, the FDA granted accelerated approval to pemigatinib (Pemazyre), the first targeted therapy for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). The FGFR inhibitor was approved for adults with CCA and FGFR2 fusion.

After decades in which patients with CCA had only chemotherapy treatment options, the FDA approval of pemigatinib represents a major milestone in the treatment of this disease, according to Lipika Goyal, MD, MPhil, Assistant Professor, Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. However, although pemigatinib has demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy, treatment responses are still short-lived. Only 18% of patients included in the landmark clinical trial that led to the drug’s approval had a response lasting ≥12 months.

At the 2020 Annual Cholangiocarcinoma Summit, Dr Goyal discussed the mechanisms of resistance to FGFR inhibition and strategies for improving the current approaches to treatment.

“CCA is only the third gastrointestinal cancer with a biomarker specific targeted therapy approved, so we’re excited about our [recent progress],” said Dr Goyal. “We’re seeing great responses in many patients; however, they’re not as prolonged as we would like them to be.”

But, she added, “We may not be squeezing as much out of this lemon as we can.”

Overcoming Acquired Resistance

According to Dr Goyal, FGFR2 fusions and rearrangements are seen in approximately 10% to 15% of patients with intrahepatic CCA. The FIGHT-202 study, which led to the approval of pemigatinib, an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-competitive, reversible selective FGFR inhibitor, demonstrated an overall response rate of 35.5%, a disease control rate of 82%, and a duration of response of 7.5 months.

“Such good response rates and durations of response are great for CCA, and certainly better than what we see with chemotherapy in an unselected population, but it doesn’t quite match up to what we see in other ‘oncogene-addicted’ tumors,” said Dr Goyal. She noted that the response rates can exceed 70% in patients with lung cancer and EGFR mutations who receive treatment with EGFR inhibitors.

A better understanding of acquired resistance could help extend durations of response, she said. Recent studies have shown, for example, that in patients whose disease progressed after receiving treatment with an ATP-competitive inhibitor, such as pemigatinib, 1 or more FGFR2 kinase domain mutations may emerge.

One of the most common alterations is in the FGFR2 V565 residue, the so-called gatekeeper alteration, but researchers have also seen multiple mutations in the “molecular brake.” In fact, Dr Goyal and colleagues believe that polyclonal resistance is one explanation for the short duration of response seen with FGFR inhibition.

“We have found that patients with polyclonal resistance have a lower median progression free survival than those who develop monoclonal resistance,” said Dr Goyal. “The 2 residues that we want to make sure we target with the next-generation inhibitors are the gatekeeper and the molecular break, V565 and V550.”

Improving Treatment Sequencing

Understanding tumor heterogeneity and addressing it up front will be important in preventing resistance in patients with CCA, Dr Goyal explained. One approach to overcoming tumor heterogeneity is sequential treatment with different FGFR inhibitors based on their spectrum of activity and the different genetic alterations that emerge during disease progression. This strategy could potentially prolong the duration of benefit from FGFR inhibition.

“Giving futibatinib, a covalent inhibitor, up front is one possibility,” she said. “Because pemigatinib is now approved, however, we should consider doing postprogression analysis for resistance to see if patients might be candidates for a covalent inhibitor.”

Given the different spectrums of activity of FGFR inhibitors, serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis could help clinicians determine how to sequence these agents more effectively based on which alterations emerge during disease progression. Many clinical trials are currently using ctDNA to understand resistance.

“The next generation inhibitors with potency against the FGFR2 kinase domain mutations are going to be key to prolonging response in this disease,” said Dr Goyal. “We also need to think about combination strategies.”

“This is a rare disease,” Dr Goyal added. “The only path forward is if we all work together.”

Related Items

KEYNOTE-966: Pembrolizumab Combined With GemCis Versus GemCis Alone in Patients With BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the KEYNOTE-966 study, pembrolizumab was added to gemcitabine/cisplatin to assess outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.
Post-hoc Analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 Trials in Patients With Advanced eCCA
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
This post-hoc analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 clinical trials provides reference survival data for patients with advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy.
Efficacy and Safety of Tinengotinib in Patients With Advanced Refractory/Relapsed CCA Who Previously Received an FGFR Inhibitor
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Investigators pooled data from 3 trials to evaluate tinengotinib in patients with advanced, refractory/relapsed cholangiocarcinoma who previously received an FGFR inhibitor.
KLF5 Inhibition Reduces Tumor Growth and Sensitizes to Chemotherapy-Induced Cell Death in Experimental Models of CCA
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Researchers evaluated KLF5 expression and its inhibition in cholangiocarcinoma using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats technology.
Phase 2 Trial of SHR-1316 Plus IBI310 in Patients With Advanced iCCA After Inadequate Response to First-Line Therapy
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In this ongoing phase 2 study, the efficacy of SHR-1316 plus IBI310 is being evaluated in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after inadequate response to first-line therapy.
Examination of Patients With CCA Treated With Novel Targeted Therapies After Extended Molecular Profiling on Liquid Biopsies
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Dr Mahmood presented results from the largest multi-institutional review of efficacy outcomes following targeted agents in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.
Phase 2 Component of the BEER-BTC Study: Comparing Bevacizumab Plus Erlotinib Maintenance Versus Observation in Patients With Advanced BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the phase 2 component of the phase 2/3 BEER-BTC study, bevacizumab plus erlotinib improved outcomes in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers.
The DEBATE Trial: Neoadjuvant Durvalumab Plus GemCis Versus GemCis Alone for Patients With Localized BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
Researchers investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine/cisplatin (GemCis) versus GemCis alone in patients with biliary tract cancer.
The Phase 2 ADJUBIL Study of Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab With or Without Capecitabine in BTC
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
In the ongoing phase 2 ADJUBIL study, the clinical activity of immunotherapies durvalumab and tremelimumab with or without capecitabine is being assessed in patients with resectable biliary tract cancer in the adjuvant setting.
Tucatinib and Trastuzumab in Patients With Previously Treated HER2-Positive Metastatic BTC: The SGNTUC-019 Study
2023 Year in Review: Cholangiocarcinoma
This phase 2 basket study investigated the combination of tucatinib and trastuzumab as second-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive biliary tract cancer.

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our newsletter or print publications, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive: